Costume Continuity Ledger
Costume teams paste scene notes, continuity records, and garment photos’ metadata, and Jev assigns a continuity issue type, checks each garment claim against the record, and scores review priority.
Verify & Escalate· check then hand off
Section · Jev
full primer →The kernel.
Jev checks each claim about Costume design against its evidence; anything unclear goes to a person, so fashion designers never act on a guess.
Why this primitiveStructured checks help crews catch continuity mismatches without generating creative dialogue or costume notes.
Kernel
a Jev `noul` checks each claim/field against its evidence; low or mid probabilities are escalated to a human review queue instead of auto-acting
Drives the UI as
claim cards marked supported / unsupported / needs review, with a review queue column
Required key.
TYPESAFE_API_KEY
Your TypeSafe key. The mega-prompt asks for it with a secure form and keeps it on the server. Jev returns typed decisions: choice, noul (yes/no probability) and score.
open ↗Add this in your Lovable project under Settings → Secrets before pasting the prompt below.
Appendix · Mega-prompt
The build prompt.
budget · 1 message
Paste into a fresh Lovable project. Make sure the key above is set first. read the build strategy →
Build "Costume Continuity Ledger" as a ONE-SHOT Lovable build (~5 credits, no follow-ups).
Single-page TanStack Start app, one route, cut scope ruthlessly.
THIS PROMPT IS SELF-CONTAINED
Do not assume the participant knows Jev or has read any other page. TypeSafe Jev is a decision model,
not a text generator. It receives `state` plus a map of typed `questions` and returns JSON that code can
use directly. Use Choice to select exactly one defined option, Noul for a yes/no probability from 0 to 1,
and Score for a probability-weighted position across ordered levels. Keep rules, thresholds, arithmetic,
and actions in code. Use a generative model only if the product separately needs prose.
CONCEPT
Costume teams paste scene notes, continuity records, and garment photos’ metadata, and Jev assigns a continuity issue type, checks each garment claim against the record, and scores review priority.
Discipline: Fashion & Textile Design (Costume design).
Jev pattern: Verify & Escalate (check then hand off) — a Jev `noul` checks each claim/field against its evidence; low or mid probabilities are escalated to a human review queue instead of auto-acting.
Why typed decisions: Structured checks help crews catch continuity mismatches without generating creative dialogue or costume notes.
ENGINE: TypeSafe Jev (typed decisions, not text)
- Before writing code, ask the participant for `TYPESAFE_API_KEY` with Lovable's secure secret form. Never
ask them to paste it into chat, never prefix it with `VITE_`, and never expose it to browser code.
- Put the callable server function in `src/lib/jev.functions.ts`; do not import a server-only module from UI code.
- Validate the user's input before the handler and read `process.env['TYPESAFE_API_KEY']` inside the handler.
- From the server, call:
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
Authorization: Bearer <TYPESAFE_API_KEY>, Content-Type: application/json
body: { "model": "jev-latest", "state": <Scene identifiers, costume records, and image metadata>, "questions": QUESTIONS }
- Ask all questions in ONE request (they run in parallel and cannot see each other).
- Read Choice from `answers[id].choice`, `.probabilities`, and `.confidence`; Score from `.score`,
`.probabilities`, `.legend`, and `.confidence`; Noul from `.noul` only (it has no separate confidence).
SERVER IMPLEMENTATION (adapt the input name and result mapping to this concept)
```ts
import { createServerFn } from "@tanstack/react-start";
import { z } from "zod";
const Input = z.object({ text: z.string().trim().min(1).max(20000) });
export const decide = createServerFn({ method: "POST" })
.inputValidator((input: unknown) => Input.parse(input))
.handler(async ({ data }) => {
const apiKey = process.env['TYPESAFE_API_KEY'];
if (!apiKey) return { ok: false as const, status: 500, message: "TYPESAFE_API_KEY is not configured." };
const requestBody = {
model: "jev-latest",
state: { text: data.text },
questions: QUESTIONS,
};
let response: Response | undefined;
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 3; attempt += 1) {
response = await fetch("https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone", {
method: "POST",
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${apiKey}`, "Content-Type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify(requestBody),
});
if (response.ok || (response.status !== 429 && response.status < 500)) break;
if (attempt < 2) await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 750 * 2 ** attempt));
}
if (!response) return { ok: false as const, status: 503, message: "Jev did not respond." };
if (!response.ok) {
const message = (await response.text()).slice(0, 500) || `Jev request failed (${response.status}).`;
return { ok: false as const, status: response.status, message };
}
const result = await response.json();
return { ok: true as const, answers: result.answers };
});
```
In the page component, call `decide` with `useServerFn`, preserve the participant's input while loading or
on error, disable duplicate submissions, and render the returned typed values rather than parsing prose.
QUESTIONS (start here, refine wording if needed)
{
"continuity_issue": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What kind of continuity issue is most likely?",
"criteria": {
"garment": "Garment identity or construction mismatch",
"color": "Color or pattern mismatch",
"accessory": "Accessory or styling mismatch",
"sequence_unclear": "Scene sequence or evidence is unclear"
}
},
"record_matches": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the continuity record support the garment details assigned to this scene?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Scene, garment, and recorded details align",
"false": "A detail conflicts, is missing, or cannot be tied to the scene"
}
},
"review_priority": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How urgent is human review before the next shoot?",
"criteria": [
"1: No evident continuity risk",
"2: Minor discrepancy with low impact",
"3: Likely visible discrepancy",
"4: Major mismatch or critical scene evidence gap"
]
}
}
DECISION RULES (in code, not in the model)
- choice/score: if confidence < 0.6 show a "needs review" badge instead of acting.
- noul: >= 0.75 = yes, <= 0.25 = no, otherwise "review".
- score: normalise with score / (levels - 1) before combining with weights.
- Missing or malformed answers go to review. Show safe HTTP status and message in the UI. Retry only 429/5xx,
at most twice with increasing delay; never retry 400/401/402/403/404 and never invent results.
- If the product needs prose (a summary, a message), use Lovable AI for that text only; Jev makes the decisions.
UI
claim cards marked supported / unsupported / needs review, with a review queue column. Include 2 sample inputs as one-click chips so the demo works instantly.
Tailwind + shadcn, editorial look, footer: "Built during the Creative AI & Quantum Hackathon organised by StreetKode Fam during Indian Krump Festival 14".
NO database, NO auth, NO extra pages, NO tests.
BEFORE YOU FINISH
- Run the app and test both sample inputs through the real server function.
- Confirm the browser receives no API key and no fabricated fallback result.
- Confirm Choice/Score confidence and Noul probability drive the stated review rules.
- Confirm loading, success, review, empty-input, and service-error states are readable on mobile.
Reference only if needed: https://docs.typesafe.ai/api and https://docs.typesafe.ai/primitives
Market sizing.
TAM
Film and TV production software: $3B+
SAM
Costume and wardrobe departments: $250M
SOM
Independent productions and costume houses: $5M
Indicative figures for hackathon pitches — refine with your own research before raising.
Adjacent entries.
Costume design
Costume Continuity Desk
Costume teams paste scene breakdowns and costume notes, and Jev routes each entry to a continuity change while flagging tracking needs and scoring change impact.
Costume designCostume Continuity Check
Paste a scene breakdown and costume continuity notes; Jev evaluates continuity conditions and code lists scenes that fail any required check.
Costume designCostume Rack Ranker
Costume designers paste character briefs and wardrobe options, and Jev scores and ranks each option on character fit, movement, and scene suitability using weights they control in code.
Costume designCostume Continuity Desk
Paste a continuity report and scene notes, and Jev selects the exact costume detail that should be checked for the next scene, or none.